Ben Uzor Jr
Information has emerged that the Nigerian
Communications Commission (NCC) is adopting a new industry structure for
broadband deployment that would engender effective competition at all layers of
the telecoms industry, drive innovation and infrastructure sharing, as well as
provide a platform for the speedy deployment of broadband infrastructure. With
this new structure, Nigeria’s internet access problem characterised by slow and
exasperating access to the cyberspace, inspite of the growing number of underwater
cable systems on the country’s coastline, would be resolved before long.
At a broadband infrastructure forum in July, Eugene Juwah,
Executive Vice Chairman (EVC), NCC had disclosed that the commission was
considering three possible models that would assist in the effective
implementation of the commission’s ‘Open Access Strategy’. The strategy is
specifically designed to strengthen investment in the area of deploying in-land
fibre and last mile networks needed to move available bandwidth capacity around
the length and breadth of the country. The three possible models presented to
the forum include - the Utility Model, Equal Access Model, and Passive
Infrastructure Model. According to NCC helmsman, “the Utility Model provides
equal access but to a reduced extent, because it combines the active layer
(OpCo) and the passive layer (NetCo), which brings about the InfraCo.
The Passive Infrastructure Model does not provide for equal
access, as it permits the OpCos (transmission companies) to also be retail
service providers. “Lastly, in the Equal Access Model-the NetCos are separated
from the OpCos and the retail service providers. According to the new report by
the commission on Monday, Juwah indicated that after due consideration of the
three industry structure models, “the Equal Access Model is being considered as
the possible industry structure for broadband access deployment in Nigeria.” In this model, bandwidth will be provided by the active
infrastructure providers to the retail service providers on a fair and
non-discriminatory basis.
The active Infrastructure providers will buy bulk bandwidth from the submarine cable companies, which are then delivered via optical fiber owned by the passive infrastructure provider. This, according to Juwah is in contrast to the current broadband infrastructure market structure that is highly vertically integrated, where some players provide both passive, active and retail services on one hand, while providing passive and active (or part active) infrastructure to other players who they compete with in the retail segment on the other hand, with no price capping at the interconnecting layers.
The active Infrastructure providers will buy bulk bandwidth from the submarine cable companies, which are then delivered via optical fiber owned by the passive infrastructure provider. This, according to Juwah is in contrast to the current broadband infrastructure market structure that is highly vertically integrated, where some players provide both passive, active and retail services on one hand, while providing passive and active (or part active) infrastructure to other players who they compete with in the retail segment on the other hand, with no price capping at the interconnecting layers.
Analysts are all agreed that this current market
situation has given rise to price regimes that negate the objective of
increasing broadband penetration in Nigeria. Juwah disclosed that the
implementation of the open access model would bridge the gaps in broadband
deployment, eliminate last mile issues, reduce the price of bandwidth for end
users and unlock the market for massive broadband usage in Nigeria. The
commission also disclosed that it would issue licenses in the passive and
active layers, while price caps would be
implemented in these layers, using cost based pricing. In the retail service
layer, Juwah explained that multiple licenses would be issued, with pricing to
end users determined essentially by market forces.
To enable service delivery at affordable prices for the
end-user, where it may not be economically viable to do so, the EVC pointed out
that the commission would offer financial incentives to the infrastructure
providers to enable them operate reasonably profitably. In addition, the
federal government, through the commission, would facilitate agreements and
engage in dispute resolution among the various industry stakeholders.
No comments:
Post a Comment